Why the Most Mentally Healthy People Aren't Feeling Less — They're Wobbling Less
By Dr. Akash Parihar | MD Psychiatry | Asha Wellness
Sanctuary Hospital, Kota
Tags: equanimity mental health, Upekkha psychology,
emotional stability India, how to be unbothered, emotional immune system,
equanimity and anxiety, Indian philosophy mental health, how to stop being
affected by everything, emotional regulation techniques India, equanimity vs
emotional numbness, Upekkha Buddhism psychology, good day bad day same person,
emotional resilience India, psychiatric perspective equanimity, how to stay
calm under pressure India
"same you. different weather."
There is a word in Pali — one of the oldest languages in
which psychological wisdom was ever systematically recorded — that modern
psychiatry has spent decades trying to reinvent.
The word is Upekkha.
It is usually translated as equanimity. But equanimity is
a word that has been flattened by modern usage into something passive and
bloodless — a picture of a person sitting very still, feeling very little,
unbothered by anything because nothing reaches them.
That is not what Upekkha means. And that is not what this
article is about.
Upekkha — equanimity in its full, psychologically precise
meaning — is not the absence of feeling. It is the absence of being controlled
by feeling. It is the capacity to experience a good day without becoming dependent
on that goodness, and a bad day without being dismantled by it. It is the state
in which you are, as the poster says with deceptive simplicity:
The constant. Not the weather.
This is not spiritual philosophy dressed up as
psychology. This is one of the most clinically useful frameworks available for
understanding emotional regulation — and it maps almost perfectly onto what
modern neuroscience and psychiatric research tells us about what separates
people who are mentally resilient from those who are not.
Let's actually understand it.
The Problem With How We
Currently Understand Emotional Health
Before we build the case for equanimity, let's examine
the framework most of us are unconsciously operating with — because it is
quietly making things worse.
The dominant popular narrative about emotional health
goes something like this: positive emotions are good, negative emotions are
bad, and the goal of mental health practice is to maximise the former and
minimise the latter.
We chase good days. We avoid bad ones. We optimise our
environments, our relationships, our schedules for the production of positive
feeling. When a good day arrives, we grip it. When a bad day arrives, we resist
it, pathologise it, wonder what went wrong.
The psychological consequence of this framework is a
nervous system that is reactive to everything — soaring when things go
well, crashing when they don't, in a state of constant emotional
weather-watching because the quality of your inner experience is entirely
contingent on external conditions.
This is not stability. This is a life lived at the mercy
of circumstances.
And here is what psychiatry knows about it: emotional
reactivity — the tendency to experience intense, rapidly fluctuating mood
states in response to external events — is one of the most robust risk factors
for anxiety disorders, depression, burnout, and relationship difficulties. The
nervous system that is exquisitely sensitive to every shift in external weather
is also the nervous system most vulnerable to being overwhelmed by it.
Upekkha offers a different framework entirely. Not:
maximise good feeling. But: become the kind of person whose essential stability
does not depend on which kind of feeling is present today.
What Equanimity Is — And
Critically, What It Isn't
This distinction matters enough to spend real time on it,
because the most common misunderstanding of equanimity — both in popular
culture and in therapy rooms — is that it means emotional numbness.
It does not.
Equanimity is not:
- Suppressing
emotions
- Pretending
bad things are fine
- Toxic
positivity ("everything happens for a reason")
- Emotional
detachment or dissociation
- Not
caring about outcomes
- Spiritual
bypassing — using philosophical frameworks to avoid genuine emotional
processing
Equanimity is:
- Experiencing
emotions fully without being destabilised by them
- Allowing
feelings to move through you without gripping the good ones or resisting
the bad ones
- Maintaining
a stable sense of self that exists independently of the present mood state
- The
capacity to observe your own emotional experience with a degree of
perspective
- What
happens when you stop treating every emotional fluctuation as a verdict on
your life
The clinical language for this is affect tolerance
— the ability to tolerate the full range of emotional experience without either
suppression or dysregulation. It is the emotional equivalent of a body with a
healthy immune system: not one that never encounters pathogens, but one that
encounters them, mounts an appropriate response, and returns to baseline
without being destroyed.
Your emotional immune system. That is exactly what
Upekkha is.
The Neuroscience Behind the
Balance
The scales in the image — Good Day on one side, Bad Day
on the other, balanced at the centre — are a more accurate illustration of
neuroscience than they might appear.
Your brain has a concept called the hedonic baseline
— a relatively stable set point of subjective wellbeing around which your mood
fluctuates. Research in affective neuroscience consistently shows that while
individuals vary in their baseline, most people return to something close to
their characteristic baseline following both positive and negative events. This
is sometimes called hedonic adaptation.
The person who wins the lottery returns, within months,
to their pre-lottery baseline wellbeing. The person who suffers a significant
loss typically returns, over time, to something approximating their previous
level of life satisfaction. This is not suppression of feeling. It is the
natural resilience architecture of a well-regulated nervous system.
What mental health conditions — particularly depression,
anxiety disorders, and borderline personality disorder — disrupt is precisely
this return-to-baseline capacity. The depressed nervous system, following a
negative event, does not return. It stays down, or spirals further. The anxious
nervous system, following a perceived threat, does not de-escalate. It stays
activated.
Equanimity, neurologically, is a well-functioning hedonic
baseline with strong return-to-baseline capacity. It is not a
state devoid of emotional fluctuation. It is a state in which the fluctuations
are appropriate to the trigger and the return to baseline is reliable.
This is measurable. It is trainable. And it is one of the
primary targets of evidence-based psychological interventions including
Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT), Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy
(MBCT), and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).
High = Not Permanent. Low = Not
Permanent. You = The Constant.
This sentence from the poster is, psychologically, one of
the most useful things you can internalise.
Here is why each part matters:
"High = not
permanent."
The inability to tolerate the ending of good things is
one of the most underrecognised sources of psychological suffering. We call it
by different names — attachment, craving, the fear of loss — but the mechanism
is the same: we mistake a temporary state for a permanent one, and we suffer
when reality corrects the mistake.
The student who performs well on a mock test and becomes
dependent on that performance for their sense of worth suffers more acutely
when the next test disappoints. The person who falls into a period of happiness
and clings to it, monitoring it anxiously for signs of ending, often
accelerates its departure through the anxiety of grasping.
Buddhism identified this as upādāna — clinging —
and modern positive psychology has arrived at the same conclusion through a
different route: savouring (appreciating good experiences while they're
present) produces significantly greater wellbeing than clinging (trying
to hold onto them or desperately seeking their repetition).
Equanimity with good things looks like: appreciating them
fully, without making your continued stability dependent on their continuation.
"Low = not
permanent."
This is the half of the equation that depression and
anxiety specifically disrupt — the neurological conviction, in the depths of a
bad period, that the low is permanent, that the suffering is the final state,
that the baseline to which one might return no longer exists.
One of the most powerful cognitive interventions in
depression treatment is precisely this: helping the patient access the
experiential knowledge that previous low states have ended. That there
is evidence, in their own history, that the weather changes. That the present
state, however convincing its permanence feels, has been wrong about that
before.
Equanimity with difficult emotions looks like: allowing
them to be present without treating their presence as permanent information
about the future.
"You = the
constant."
This is the deepest psychological claim in the whole
framework — and the one most directly supported by both ancient wisdom
traditions and modern psychological research.
The construct of a stable observing self — a
capacity for awareness that exists somewhat independently of the content of
present experience — is the foundation of every evidence-based third-wave
psychological therapy. ACT calls it the "observing self" or
"self-as-context." DBT calls it the "wise mind." MBCT
cultivates it through mindfulness practice. All of them are pointing at the
same thing.
There is a part of your psychological architecture that
is not the good mood. Not the bad mood. Not the anxiety, not the euphoria, not
the grief, not the triumph. The part that notices all of these. The part that
is present through all of these. The part that — when you are able to access it
— provides the stable ground from which you can experience the weather without
being the weather.
You are not your moods. You are the one having them.
This is not spiritual bypassing. It is one of the most
empirically supported psychological frameworks for building emotional
resilience. And it is precisely what Upekkha points toward.
Why This Matters More Than
Ever in 2025
We are living through what researchers are calling a global
epidemic of emotional dysregulation — rising rates of anxiety, depression,
burnout, and the particular kind of psychological fragility that comes from a
culture that has optimised for stimulation, novelty, and the endless management
of emotional states rather than the development of emotional stability.
Social media has created an environment of constant
emotional weather. Every scroll brings a new emotional input — outrage,
delight, anxiety, comparison, validation, rejection — at a frequency and
intensity that the human nervous system was never designed to process. We are,
in aggregate, becoming less able to tolerate the ordinary emotional texture of
a life — its boredom, its uncertainty, its occasional flatness — because we
have trained our nervous systems to expect constant stimulation.
The consequence is a population that is, paradoxically,
both more emotionally expressive and less emotionally stable than previous
generations. We have better language for our feelings. We are worse at sitting
with them.
Upekkha — equanimity — is not a retreat from modern life.
It is the specific psychological capacity that modern life most relentlessly
erodes, and most urgently requires.
Building Your Emotional Immune
System: The Practical Framework
Equanimity is not a personality trait you either have or don't
have. It is a capacity that is developed — through practice, through
understanding, and through the gradual training of the nervous system's
response to emotional experience.
1. Name the weather, not the
self
When a difficult emotion arrives — anxiety, frustration,
sadness — practice the linguistic distinction: not "I am anxious" but
"I am noticing anxiety." Not "I am depressed" but "I
am experiencing a depressive feeling right now."
This is not semantic games. This is a neurologically
meaningful shift — from fusion with the emotional state (you are the weather)
to observation of it (you are noticing the weather). Research in defusion
techniques from ACT therapy shows this shift measurably reduces the behavioural
impact of negative emotional states.
2. Allow without amplifying
The natural human response to difficult emotions is
resistance — the attempt to suppress, argue with, or escape the feeling.
Research on thought suppression by Daniel Wegner and others shows that this
resistance paradoxically increases the intensity and frequency of the unwanted
experience.
Equanimity practice involves allowing the emotion to be
present — fully, without resistance — while observing that its presence is
tolerable and temporary. This is the principle underlying mindfulness-based
therapy: not changing the emotional content, but changing the relationship to
it.
3. Identify your baseline
Most people have never consciously identified their
emotional baseline — their characteristic level of wellbeing when things are neither
particularly good nor particularly bad. Without this baseline, you have no
reference point for what "returning to stability" means.
Spend a week observing your neutral state — the mornings
that are neither exciting nor distressing. This is your baseline. This is what
you are returning to when things get hard. Making it explicit gives you an
anchor.
4. Practise impermanence with
positive states
Deliberately remind yourself, during good periods, that
the good is temporary — not to diminish it, but to reduce the clinging that
makes its ending unnecessarily painful. Savouring and acknowledging
impermanence are not contradictory. You can appreciate something fully
precisely because you know it will pass.
5. Seek support when the
baseline is broken
Equanimity is a healthy psychological capacity — and when
the baseline itself is broken, when the nervous system's return-to-baseline
function is disrupted by depression, anxiety disorder, or trauma, equanimity
practices alone are insufficient. This is when professional psychiatric and
psychological support is not a luxury but a clinical necessity.
A psychiatrist or therapist does not help you feel
nothing. They help you restore the capacity to feel everything — without being
destroyed by it. That is the clinical version of Upekkha.
The Most Important Thing This
Article Says
Unbothered — in its truest, deepest, most psychologically
meaningful sense — is not the person who has stopped feeling.
It is the person who feels the full range of human
experience — good days and bad days, joy and grief, success and failure — and
remains, through all of it, the constant at the centre of the scales.
Not numb. Not detached. Not above it all.
Present. Grounded. Themselves.
That is Upekkha. That is your emotional immune system.
And it is something you can build.
📞 For
psychiatric support in building emotional resilience and regulation: Dr.
Akash Parihar | MD Psychiatry Asha Wellness Sanctuary Hospital, Kota
📞 7300342858
Mental Health Support (India): iCall:
9152987821 | Vandrevala Foundation: 1860-2662-345
References: Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever You Go, There
You Are. | Hayes, S.C. (2004). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. | Wegner,
D.M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review. |
Fredrickson, B.L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology.
American Psychologist.
No comments:
Post a Comment